[PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:20:00AM +0800, chenjiahao (C) wrote:
> 
> On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to
> > riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD
> (commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and
> it seems all ok.

> Could you try applying with the base above, or
> is there any problem with that base?

There's some difference between linux-next and riscv/for-next that
prevents the patchwork automation from applying the patches.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230726/c2993dcb/attachment.sig>