[PATCH v4 09/13] riscv: switch to relative alternative entries

Andrew Jones ajones at ventanamicro.com
Fri Jan 20 10:34:18 PST 2023


On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 11:49:49PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
...
>  #define ALT_ENTRY(oldptr, newptr, vendor_id, errata_id, newlen)		\
> -	RISCV_PTR " " oldptr "\n"					\
> -	RISCV_PTR " " newptr "\n"					\
> -	REG_ASM " " vendor_id "\n"					\
> -	REG_ASM " " newlen "\n"						\
> -	".word " errata_id "\n"
> +	".4byte	((" oldptr ") - .) \n"					\
> +	".4byte	((" newptr ") - .) \n"					\
> +	".2byte	" vendor_id "\n"					\
> +	".2byte " newlen "\n"						\
> +	".4byte	" errata_id "\n"
>

Hi Jisheng,

This patch breaks loading the KVM module for me. I got "kvm: Unknown
relocation type 34". My guess is that these 2 byte fields are inspiring
the compiler to emit 16-bit relocation types. The patch below fixes
things for me. If you agree with fixing it this way, rather than
changing something in alternatives, like not using 2 byte fields,
then please pick the below patch up in your series.

Thanks,
drew

>From 4d203697aa745a0cd3a9217d547a9fb7fa2a87c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:05:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: module: Add ADD16 and SUB16 rela types
Content-type: text/plain

To prepare for 16-bit relocation types to be emitted in alternatives
add support for ADD16 and SUB16.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
index 76f4b9c2ec5b..7c651d55fcbd 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
@@ -268,6 +268,13 @@ static int apply_r_riscv_align_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static int apply_r_riscv_add16_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
+				    Elf_Addr v)
+{
+	*(u16 *)location += (u16)v;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int apply_r_riscv_add32_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
 				    Elf_Addr v)
 {
@@ -282,6 +289,13 @@ static int apply_r_riscv_add64_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int apply_r_riscv_sub16_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
+				    Elf_Addr v)
+{
+	*(u16 *)location -= (u16)v;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int apply_r_riscv_sub32_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
 				    Elf_Addr v)
 {
@@ -315,8 +329,10 @@ static int (*reloc_handlers_rela[]) (struct module *me, u32 *location,
 	[R_RISCV_CALL]			= apply_r_riscv_call_rela,
 	[R_RISCV_RELAX]			= apply_r_riscv_relax_rela,
 	[R_RISCV_ALIGN]			= apply_r_riscv_align_rela,
+	[R_RISCV_ADD16]			= apply_r_riscv_add16_rela,
 	[R_RISCV_ADD32]			= apply_r_riscv_add32_rela,
 	[R_RISCV_ADD64]			= apply_r_riscv_add64_rela,
+	[R_RISCV_SUB16]			= apply_r_riscv_sub16_rela,
 	[R_RISCV_SUB32]			= apply_r_riscv_sub32_rela,
 	[R_RISCV_SUB64]			= apply_r_riscv_sub64_rela,
 };
-- 
2.39.0




More information about the linux-riscv mailing list