[RFC PATCH 0/1] riscv: Introduce system suspend support

[Andrew Jones]

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:34:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey Drew!
> 
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 12:32:15PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Booting with an OpenSBI including the RFC series[1] implementing the
> > draft proposal for SBI system suspend[2] we can add system support to
> > Linux. This support implements "suspend-to-RAM", which means when a
> > kernel is built with CONFIG_SUSPEND 'echo mem > /sys/power/state' will
> > initiate a suspension.
> > 
> > This has only been tested on QEMU using the OpenSBI system suspend
> > test. The test just waits 5 seconds and then resumes. To truly use
> > system suspend a platform must have a low-level firmware implementation
> > and provide at least one wake-up event, such as from a wakeup-capable
> > RTC alarm, to resume.
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/jones-drew/opensbi/commits/susp-rfc
> >     Posting: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/opensbi/2023-January/004091.html
> > [2] https://github.com/jones-drew/riscv-sbi-doc/commit/d9e43e9a938fc3eb510e023c3f352462876f7785
> 
> In case you don't get alerts from GH, I left one *tiny* comment on this.
> And I really mean tiny!

Hi Conor,

Yup, I saw the comma suggestion and agree with it. As there are two other
instances of that error description in the spec I'll also send a PR to add
commas to them as well.

Thanks,
drew