[PATCH v1 6/7] soc: microchip: mpfs: simplify error handling in mpfs_blocking_transaction()
Conor Dooley
conor.dooley at microchip.com
Wed Jan 11 05:45:12 PST 2023
The error handling has a kinda weird nested-if setup that is not really
adding anything. Switch it to more of an early return arrangement as a
predatory step for adding different handing for timeouts and failed
services.
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
---
drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c | 28 ++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
index 738ecd624d64..4aadd05769d2 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/microchip/mpfs-sys-controller.c
@@ -32,28 +32,26 @@ struct mpfs_sys_controller {
int mpfs_blocking_transaction(struct mpfs_sys_controller *sys_controller, struct mpfs_mss_msg *msg)
{
unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(MPFS_SYS_CTRL_TIMEOUT_MS);
- int ret, err;
+ int ret;
- err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&transaction_lock);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&transaction_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
reinit_completion(&sys_controller->c);
ret = mbox_send_message(sys_controller->chan, msg);
- if (ret >= 0) {
- if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&sys_controller->c, timeout)) {
- ret = 0;
- } else {
- ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
- dev_warn(sys_controller->client.dev,
- "MPFS sys controller transaction timeout\n");
- }
- } else {
- dev_err(sys_controller->client.dev,
- "mpfs sys controller transaction returned %d\n", ret);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ ret = 0; /* mbox_send_message returns postitive integers on success */
+ if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&sys_controller->c, timeout)) {
+ ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ dev_warn(sys_controller->client.dev,
+ "MPFS sys controller transaction timeout\n");
}
+out:
mutex_unlock(&transaction_lock);
return ret;
--
2.39.0
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list