[RFC PATCH 1/1] riscv: sbi: Introduce system suspend support

[Andrew Jones]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:06:30AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:52:11AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:23:00PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 12:32:16PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > When the SUSP SBI extension is present it implies that the standard
> > > > "suspend to RAM" type is available. Wire it up to the generic
> > > > platform suspend support, also applying the already present support
> > > > for non-retentive CPU suspend. When the kernel is built with
> > > > CONFIG_SUSPEND, one can do 'echo mem > /sys/power/state' to suspend.
> > > > Resumption will occur when a platform-specific wake-up event arrives.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
> > > 
> > > First things first, anything SBI depends on !m-mode, so you've gotta add
> > > some sort of gating unfortunately around those ECALLs. But I figure you
> > > may have already seen the build failures on patchwork for nommu?
> > 
> > Actually, no, and I think I missed other emails like that in the past. I
> > assume I'm on the To: of these messages, so it's odd they're not showing
> > up. Can you forward me this message? I'll inspect the headers and try to
> > figure what's going on.
> 
> Oh my bad, I assumed that you'd look on patchwork. I haven't made it send
> emails as I don't trust it not to spam people with build issues that are
> not their fault.

Ah, OK. I'll add a patchwork check to my patch submission workflow!

Thanks,
drew