[PATCH v1 1/7] RISC-V: introduce ARCH_FOO kconfig aliases for SOC_FOO symbols

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 07:22:47AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> By the way, I recall some pushback with the renaming of SOC_XXX to
> ARCH_XXX. I personally do not like it and Christoph suggested the revers
> approach of renaming arm ARCH_XXX to something else instead. I did not
> follow further on that discussion, but it looks like the riscv SOC_XXX
> renaming went through ?

We asked the ARM guys about it, I think on IRC as they'd not replied to
the thread, and cold water was poured on the idea.

It's Murphy's Law that the thing with the problem would be the k210 too
isn't it.
I could've sworn I booted one of each vendor so kinda kicking myself
right now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230110/87d97e24/attachment.sig>