[PATCH] riscv: elf: add .riscv.attributes parsing
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Tue Jan 10 14:29:18 PST 2023
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:16:58PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 1/10/23 14:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:18:41PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com> # code under CONFIG_COMPAT
> > You can drop this, even if it reported against a private branch AFAIU,
> > just like its complaints about patches. As Greg would say, LKP didn't
> > report a feature!
>
> OK. Personally I tend to add Tested-by (vs. Reported-by for the same
> reasons) to still give them the credit for finding some issue.
> I can certainly drop it.
What I've seen Greg say is that you don't add "Reported-by" if someone
tells you your patch doesn't compile, so why would you for the build
robots.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230110/0be0dcc2/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list