[PATCH v4] dt-bindings: riscv: add SBI PMU event mappings
Conor Dooley
conor.dooley at microchip.com
Mon Jan 9 02:24:11 PST 2023
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 10:17:41AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 10:27:15AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 09:50:48PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> > >
> > > The SBI PMU extension requires a firmware to be aware of the event to
> > > counter/mhpmevent mappings supported by the hardware. OpenSBI may use
> > > DeviceTree to describe the PMU mappings. This binding is currently
> > > described in markdown in OpenSBI (since v1.0 in Dec 2021) & used by QEMU
> > > since v7.2.0.
> > >
> > > Import the binding for use while validating dtb dumps from QEMU and
> > > upcoming hardware (eg JH7110 SoC) that will make use of the event
> > > mapping.
> > >
> > > Link: https://github.com/riscv-software-src/opensbi/blob/master/docs/pmu_support.md
> > > Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/riscv-sbi.adoc # Performance Monitoring Unit Extension
> > > Co-developed-by: Atish Patra <atishp at rivosinc.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp at rivosinc.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v4:
> > > - A bunch of minor description/comment changes suggested by Drew
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - align descriptions to SBI spec (and fix a misinterpretation of mine)
> > > - switch to a nested items description, since the descriptions are for
> > > the elements of each entry, not the entries themselves
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - use the schema mechanism for dependancies between properties
> > > - +CC perf maintainers...
> > > - move the matrix element descriptions into regular item descriptions
> > > rather than doing so freeform in the property description
> > > - drop some description text that no longer applies since changes were
> > > made to the SBI spec
> > > - drop mention of the "generic platform" which is OpenSBI specific
> > > - drop the min/max items from the matrices, they don't appear to be
> > > needed?
> > >
> > > Note:
> > > OpenSBI is BSD-2-Clause licensed so I am unsure as to whether I can
> > > submit it with a dual license.
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/perf/riscv,pmu.yaml | 160 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 160 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/riscv,pmu.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/riscv,pmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/riscv,pmu.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..5e7a54e3d91b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/perf/riscv,pmu.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/perf/riscv,pmu.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: RISC-V SBI PMU events
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > + - Atish Patra <atishp at rivosinc.com>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > + The SBI PMU extension allows supervisor software to configure, start and
> > > + stop any performance counter at anytime. Thus, a user can leverage all
> > > + capabilities of performance analysis tools, such as perf, if the SBI PMU
> > > + extension is enabled. The following constraints apply:
> > > +
> > > + The platform must provide information about PMU event to counter mappings
> > > + via device tree or platform specific hooks. Otherwise, the SBI PMU
> > > + extension will not be enabled.
> > > +
> > > + Platforms should provide information about the PMU event selector values
> > > + that should be encoded in the expected value of MHPMEVENTx while configuring
> > > + MHPMCOUNTERx for that specific event. This can be done via a device tree or
> > > + platform specific hooks. The exact value to be written to MHPMEVENTx is
> > > + completely dependent on the platform.
> >
> > The previous two paragraphs reference 'platform specific hooks'. I don't
> > think this DT-specific description, as opposed to the more general OpenSBI
> > description it's derived from, should reference the hooks, as "hooks"
> > aren't defined in this context.
>
> Do you have any suggestion about how it should be worded? It is
> apparently valid to have only a compatible string in the dt-binding and
Meh, DT itself not dt-binding. The binding only "enforces"/documents that
lax requirement.
> rely on using platform hooks to communicate the mapping. In that case,
> the dt-binding only communicates the presence of SBI PMU support.
> IMO, if we don't mention that that is a valid way, the fact that we only
> require a compatible for a DT to be valid looks like a mistake in the
> binding.
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
> > > + For information on the SBI specification see the section "Performance
> > > + Monitoring Unit Extension" of:
> > > + https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/riscv-sbi.adoc
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + const: riscv,pmu
> > > +
> > > + riscv,event-to-mhpmevent:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
> > > + description:
> > > + Represents an ONE-to-ONE mapping between a PMU event and the event
> > > + selector value that the platform expects to be written to the MHPMEVENTx
> > > + CSR for that event.
> > > + The mapping is encoded in an matrix format where each element represents
> > > + an event.
> > > + This property shouldn't encode any raw hardware event.
> > > + items:
> > > + items:
> > > + - description: event_idx, a 20-bit wide encoding of the event type and
> > > + code. Refer to the SBI specification for a complete description of
> > > + the event types and codes.
> > > + - description: upper 32 bits of the event selector value for MHPMEVENTx
> > > + - description: lower 32 bits of the event selector value for MHPMEVENTx
> > > +
> > > + riscv,event-to-mhpmcounters:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
> > > + description:
> > > + Represents a MANY-to-MANY mapping between a range of events and all the
> > > + MHPMCOUNTERx in a bitmap format that can be used to monitor these range
> > > + of events. The information is encoded in an matrix format where each
> > > + element represents a certain range of events and corresponding counters.
> > > + This property shouldn't encode any raw event.
> > > + items:
> > > + items:
> > > + - description: first event_idx of the range of events
> > > + - description: last event_idx of the range of events
> > > + - description: bitmap of MHPMCOUNTERx for this event
> > > +
> > > + riscv,raw-event-to-mhpmcounters:
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
> > > + description:
> > > + Represents an ONE-to-MANY or MANY-to-MANY mapping between the rawevent(s)
> > > + and all the MHPMCOUNTERx in a bitmap format that can be used to monitor
> > > + that raw event.
> > > + The encoding of the raw events are platform specific. The information is
> > > + encoded in a matrix format where each element represents the specific raw
> > > + event(s).
> > > + If a platform directly encodes each raw PMU event as a unique ID, the
> > > + value of variant must be 0xffffffff_ffffffff.
> > > + items:
> > > + items:
> > > + - description:
> > > + upper 32 invariant bits for the range of events
> > > + - description:
> > > + lower 32 invariant bits for the range of events
> > > + - description:
> > > + upper 32 bits of the variant bit mask for the range of events
> > > + - description:
> > > + lower 32 bits of the variant bit mask for the range of events
> > > + - description:
> > > + bitmap of all MHPMCOUNTERx that can monitor the range of events
> > > +
> > > +dependencies:
> > > + "riscv,event-to-mhpmevent": [ "riscv,event-to-mhpmcounters" ]
> > > + "riscv,event-to-mhpmcounters": [ "riscv,event-to-mhpmevent" ]
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > + - compatible
> > > +
> > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +examples:
> > > + - |
> > > + pmu {
> > > + compatible = "riscv,pmu";
> > > + riscv,event-to-mhpmevent = <0x0000B 0x0000 0x0001>;
> > > + riscv,event-to-mhpmcounters = <0x00001 0x00001 0x00000001>,
> > > + <0x00002 0x00002 0x00000004>,
> > > + <0x00003 0x0000A 0x00000ff8>,
> > > + <0x10000 0x10033 0x000ff000>;
> > > + riscv,raw-event-to-mhpmcounters =
> > > + /* For event ID 0x0002 */
> > > + <0x0000 0x0002 0xffffffff 0xffffffff 0x00000f8>,
> > > + /* For event ID 0-4 */
> > > + <0x0 0x0 0xffffffff 0xfffffff0 0x00000ff0>,
> > > + /* For event ID 0xffffffff0000000f - 0xffffffff000000ff */
> > > + <0xffffffff 0x0 0xffffffff 0xffffff0f 0x00000ff0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + - |
> > > + /*
> > > + * For HiFive Unmatched board the encodings can be found here
> > > + * https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/1a82e600-1f93-4f41-b2d8-86ed8b16acba_fu740-c000-manual-v1p6.pdf
> > > + *
> > > + * This example also binds standard SBI PMU hardware IDs to U74 PMU event
> > > + * codes, U74 uses a bitfield for events encoding, so several U74 events
> > > + * can be bound to a single perf ID.
> > > + * See SBI PMU hardware IDs in arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > > + */
> > > + pmu {
> > > + compatible = "riscv,pmu";
> > > + riscv,event-to-mhpmevent =
> > > + /* SBI_PMU_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES -> Instruction or Data cache/ITIM busy */
> > > + <0x00003 0x00000000 0x1801>,
> > > + /* SBI_PMU_HW_CACHE_MISSES -> Instruction or Data cache miss or MMIO access */
> > > + <0x00004 0x00000000 0x0302>,
> > > + /* SBI_PMU_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS -> Conditional branch retired */
> > > + <0x00005 0x00000000 0x4000>,
> > > + /* SBI_PMU_HW_BRANCH_MISSES -> Branch or jump misprediction */
> > > + <0x00006 0x00000000 0x6001>,
> > > + /* L1D_READ_MISS -> Data cache miss or MMIO access */
> > > + <0x10001 0x00000000 0x0202>,
> > > + /* L1D_WRITE_ACCESS -> Data cache write-back */
> > > + <0x10002 0x00000000 0x0402>,
> > > + /* L1I_READ_ACCESS -> Instruction cache miss */
> > > + <0x10009 0x00000000 0x0102>,
> > > + /* LL_READ_MISS -> UTLB miss */
> > > + <0x10011 0x00000000 0x2002>,
> > > + /* DTLB_READ_MISS -> Data TLB miss */
> > > + <0x10019 0x00000000 0x1002>,
> > > + /* ITLB_READ_MISS-> Instruction TLB miss */
> > > + <0x10021 0x00000000 0x0802>;
> > > + riscv,event-to-mhpmcounters = <0x00003 0x00006 0x18>,
> > > + <0x10001 0x10002 0x18>,
> > > + <0x10009 0x10009 0x18>,
> > > + <0x10011 0x10011 0x18>,
> > > + <0x10019 0x10019 0x18>,
> > > + <0x10021 0x10021 0x18>;
> > > + riscv,raw-event-to-mhpmcounters = <0x0 0x0 0xffffffff 0xfc0000ff 0x18>,
> > > + <0x0 0x1 0xffffffff 0xfff800ff 0x18>,
> > > + <0x0 0x2 0xffffffff 0xffffe0ff 0x18>;
> > > + };
> > > --
> > > 2.39.0
> > >
> >
> > Besides the comment above,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230109/26a29ae4/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list