[PATCH v2 1/9] RISC-V: Add AIA related CSR defines
Anup Patel
anup at brainfault.org
Sun Jan 8 21:09:08 PST 2023
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:37 AM Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hey Anup!
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 07:44:01PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > The RISC-V AIA specification improves handling per-HART local interrupts
> > in a backward compatible manner. This patch adds defines for new RISC-V
> > AIA CSRs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> > index 0e571f6483d9..4e1356bad7b2 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> > @@ -73,7 +73,10 @@
> > #define IRQ_S_EXT 9
> > #define IRQ_VS_EXT 10
> > #define IRQ_M_EXT 11
> > +#define IRQ_S_GEXT 12
> > #define IRQ_PMU_OVF 13
> > +#define IRQ_LOCAL_MAX (IRQ_PMU_OVF + 1)
> > +#define IRQ_LOCAL_MASK ((_AC(1, UL) << IRQ_LOCAL_MAX) - 1)
> >
> > /* Exception causes */
> > #define EXC_INST_MISALIGNED 0
> > @@ -156,6 +159,26 @@
> > (_AC(1, UL) << IRQ_S_TIMER) | \
> > (_AC(1, UL) << IRQ_S_EXT))
> >
> > +/* AIA CSR bits */
> > +#define TOPI_IID_SHIFT 16
> > +#define TOPI_IID_MASK 0xfff
> > +#define TOPI_IPRIO_MASK 0xff
> > +#define TOPI_IPRIO_BITS 8
> > +
> > +#define TOPEI_ID_SHIFT 16
> > +#define TOPEI_ID_MASK 0x7ff
> > +#define TOPEI_PRIO_MASK 0x7ff
> > +
> > +#define ISELECT_IPRIO0 0x30
> > +#define ISELECT_IPRIO15 0x3f
> > +#define ISELECT_MASK 0x1ff
> > +
> > +#define HVICTL_VTI 0x40000000
> > +#define HVICTL_IID 0x0fff0000
> > +#define HVICTL_IID_SHIFT 16
> > +#define HVICTL_IPRIOM 0x00000100
> > +#define HVICTL_IPRIO 0x000000ff
>
> Why not name these as masks, like you did for the other masks?
> Also, the mask/shift defines appear inconsistent. TOPI_IID_MASK is
> intended to be used post-shift AFAICT, but HVICTL_IID_SHIFT is intended
> to be used *pre*-shift.
> Some consistency in naming and function would be great.
The following convention is being followed in asm/csr.h for defining
MASK of any XYZ field in ABC CSR:
1. ABC_XYZ : This name is used for MASK which is intended
to be used before SHIFT
2. ABC_XYZ_MASK: This name is used for MASK which is
intended to be used after SHIFT
The existing defines for [M|S]STATUS, HSTATUS, SATP, and xENVCFG
follows the above convention. The only outlier is HGATPx_VMID_MASK
define which I will fix in my next KVM RISC-V series.
I don't see how any of the AIA CSR defines are violating the above
convention.
The choice of ABC_XYZ versus ABC_XYZ_MASK name is upto
the developer as long as the above convention is not violated.
>
>
> > +/* Machine-Level High-Half CSRs (AIA) */
> > +#define CSR_MIDELEGH 0x313
>
> I feel like I could find Midelegh in an Irish dictionary lol
> Anyways, I went through the CSRs and they do all seem correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
>
Regards,
Anup
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list