[PATCH v7 00/22] Basic clock, reset & device tree support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC

[Hal Feng]

On Wed,  5 Apr 2023 22:30:45 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> 
> On Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:19:12 +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
>> This patch series adds basic clock, reset & DT support for StarFive
>> JH7110 SoC.
>> 
>> @Stephen and @Conor, I have made this series start with the shared
>> dt-bindings, so it will be easier to merge.
>> 
>> @Conor, patch 1, 2, 16~21 were already in your branch. Patch 22 is the
>> same with the patch [1] I submitted before, which you had accepted but
>> not merge it into your branch.
>> 
>> [...]
> 
> Applied to riscv-dt-for-next, thanks!

Thank you so much.

> 
> [01/22] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 system clock and reset generator
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/7fce1e39f019
> [02/22] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 always-on clock and reset generator
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/3de0c9103258
> 
> These two are shared with clk.
> 
> [16/22] dt-bindings: timer: Add StarFive JH7110 clint
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/1ff5482ab9a5
> [17/22] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add StarFive JH7110 plic
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/8406d19ca049
> 
> I took these bindings too, as Palmer has done that in the past for new
> SoC support.
> 
> [18/22] dt-bindings: riscv: Add SiFive S7 compatible
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/8868caa2a073
> [19/22] riscv: dts: starfive: Add initial StarFive JH7110 device tree
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/60bf0a39842e
> [20/22] riscv: dts: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 pin function definitions
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/e22f09e598d1
> [21/22] riscv: dts: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 VisionFive 2 board device tree
>         https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/54baba33392d
> [22/22] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110: Correct the properties of S7 core
>         (squashed)
> 
> Hal, can you get your folks to resend whatever dts bits that are now
> applicable? IOW, the dt-bindings for the entries are in a for-next
> branch for some subsystem.

Of course. As far as I know, these nodes include trng / pmu / mmc / qspi.

Best regards,
Hal