[PATCH v2 02/14] clk: starfive: Rename "jh7100" to "jh71x0" for the common code

[Hal Feng]

On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:32:24 +0100, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 08:16, Hal Feng <hal.feng at starfivetech.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:26:27 +0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 02:06, Hal Feng <hal.feng at starfivetech.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rename "clk-starfive-jh7100.h" to "clk-starfive-jh71x0.h" and rename
> > > > some variables from "jh7100" or "JH7100" to "jh71x0" or "JH71X0".
> > > >
> > > > Co-developed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel at esmil.dk>
> > >
> > > The patch is fine, but I'm a little unsure about this Co-developed-by.
> > > This patch is taken directly from my jh7110 branch so does Hal sending
> > > it count as co-developed-by?
> >
> > Your original patch merged patch 1 and patch 2. Suggested by Stephen, I
> > split the patch into two patches, and I need to add a new commit. My
> > previous thinking was that the Co-developed-by tag should not be added
> > to the commit author, so I added it to you.
> 
> Even if you didn't just copy it[1] I still don't think splitting
> patches counts as "developed by". You can set the author of new
> commits or copy them from a previous commit with git commit -c.

Okay, I will remove my Co-developed-by tag in patch 1, 2, 4, 5 and set the
commit author as you.

> 
> [1]: https://github.com/esmil/linux/commit/df4bcbc307e97cb6a0e7b8ed5ecc66487395176d

Oh, I don't even know you still work on JH7110 and update on github.. All
your patches were cherry-picked from your gitlab branch. There is no doubt
that we did the same thing for this patch.

Best regards,
Hal