[PATCH v3] scripts/gdb: add lx_current support for riscv

Conor Dooley conor.dooley at microchip.com
Tue Nov 15 06:38:27 PST 2022


Hey Deepak,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:49:23AM -0800, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> csr_sscratch CSR holds current task_struct address when hart is in
> user space. Trap handler on entry spills csr_sscratch into "tp" (x2)
> register and zeroes out csr_sscratch CSR. Trap handler on exit reloads
> "tp" with expected user mode value and place current task_struct address
> again in csr_scratch CSR.
> 
> This patch assumes "tp" is pointing to task_struct. If value in
> csr_scratch is numerically greater than "tp" then it assumes csr_scratch

nit: s/scratch/sscratch/ ?

> is correct address of current task_struct. This logic holds when
>    - hart is in user space, "tp" will be less than csr_scratch.
>    - hart is in kernel space but not in trap handler, "tp" will be more
>      than csr_scratch (csr_scratch being equal to 0).
>    - hart is executing trap handler
>        - "tp" is still pointing to user mode but csr_scratch contains
>           ptr to task_struct. Thus numerically higher.
>        - "tp" is  pointing to task_struct but csr_scratch now contains
>           either 0 or numerically smaller value (transiently holds
>           user mode tp)
> 
> Patch also adds new cached type "ulong" in scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug at rivosinc.com>

I noticed when looking into patchwork complaining about checkpatch
errors in v2, that b4 had actually downloaded v3 but I could not see
this patch on the RISC-V list. I don't see a changelog anywhere here
from v2 either, nor did you pick up Drew's Reviewed-by.

What's the story there?

One really minor thing below. Should be able to fix it up trivially up
& submit a v4, CCing the linux-riscv list.

> ---
>  scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py  | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py
> index 15fc4626d236..ca5215a660c7 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py
> @@ -173,6 +173,21 @@ def get_current_task(cpu):
>           else:
>               raise gdb.GdbError("Sorry, obtaining the current task is not allowed "
>                                  "while running in userspace(EL0)")
> +    elif utils.is_target_arch("riscv"):
> +         current_tp = gdb.parse_and_eval("$tp")
> +         scratch_reg = gdb.parse_and_eval("$sscratch")
> +
> +         # by default tp points to current task
> +         current_task = current_tp.cast(task_ptr_type)
> +
> +         # scratch register is set 0 in trap handler after entering kernel.
> +         # When hart is in user mode, scratch register is pointing to task_struct.
> +         # and tp is used by user mode. So when scratch register holds larger value
> +         # (negative address as ulong is larger value) than tp, then use scratch register.
> +         if (scratch_reg.cast(utils.get_ulong_type()) >  current_tp.cast(utils.get_ulong_type())):
                                                          ^^
extra space here?


> +             current_task = scratch_reg.cast(task_ptr_type)
> +
> +         return current_task.dereference()
>      else:
>          raise gdb.GdbError("Sorry, obtaining the current task is not yet "
>                             "supported with this arch")
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> index 1553f68716cc..ddaf3089170d 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py
> @@ -35,12 +35,17 @@ class CachedType:
>  
>  
>  long_type = CachedType("long")
> +ulong_type = CachedType("ulong")
>  atomic_long_type = CachedType("atomic_long_t")
>  
>  def get_long_type():
>      global long_type
>      return long_type.get_type()
>  
> +def get_ulong_type():
> +    global ulong_type
> +    return ulong_type.get_type()
> +
>  def offset_of(typeobj, field):
>      element = gdb.Value(0).cast(typeobj)
>      return int(str(element[field].address).split()[0], 16)
> -- 
> 2.25.1



More information about the linux-riscv mailing list