[PATCH v2] riscv/kprobe: reclaim insn_slot on kprobe unregistration
Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
mhiramat at kernel.org
Thu May 26 08:33:30 PDT 2022
On Wed, 25 May 2022 09:44:24 +0800
Liao Chang <liaochang1 at huawei.com> wrote:
> On kprobe registration kernel allocate one insn_slot for new kprobe,
> but it forget to reclaim the insn_slot on unregistration, leading to a
> potential leakage.
>
> Reported-by: Chen Guokai <chenguokai17 at mails.ucas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1 at huawei.com>
Looks good to me.
Fixes: c22b0bcb1dd0 ("riscv: Add kprobes supported")
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat at kernel.org>
Thank you,
> ---
> v2:
> Add Reported-by tag
>
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index e6e950b7cf32..f12eb1fbb52c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>
> void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> + if (p->ainsn.api.insn) {
> + free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.api.insn, 0);
> + p->ainsn.api.insn = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat at kernel.org>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list