[linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION 8cb8311e95e3bb58bd84d6350365f14a718faa6d
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at oracle.com
Thu May 26 01:48:32 PDT 2022
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 02:16:34AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Bizarre this started showing up now. The recent patch was:
>
> - info->alloced += compound_nr(page);
> - inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE << compound_order(page);
> + info->alloced += folio_nr_pages(folio);
> + inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE << folio_order(folio);
>
> so it could tell that compound_order() was small, but folio_order()
> might be large?
The old code also generates a warning on my test system. Smatch thinks
both compound_order() and folio_order() are 0-255. I guess because of
the "unsigned char compound_order;" in the struct page.
regards,
dan carpenter
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list