[PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer at dabbelt.com
Wed May 25 17:39:39 PDT 2022
On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56:07 PDT (-0700), linux at roeck-us.net wrote:
> On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux at roeck-us.net wrote:
>>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren at kernel.org wrote:
>>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
>>>> fail.
>>>>
>>>> [ 11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
>>>> [ 11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
>>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
>>>> [ 11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
>>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
>>>> [ 11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>>>> [ 11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
>>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
>>>> [ 11.629586] gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
>>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>>> [ 11.629598] t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
>>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
>>>> [ 11.629610] s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
>>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
>>>> [ 11.629622] a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
>>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
>>>> [ 11.629634] a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 11.629645] s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
>>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
>>>> [ 11.629656] s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
>>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
>>>> [ 11.629667] s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 11.629678] s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
>>>> 0000000000000001
>>>> [ 11.629688] t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
>>>> [ 11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
>>>> cause: 000000000000000d
>>>>
>>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
>>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
>>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de>
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net>
>>
>> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
>>
> Yes.
Awosome, I think that was the only big blocker so far.
I added a musl-based userspace to my test setup, which is rv64-only
(buildroot doesn't have rv32 musl, I thought upstream had it but maybe
i'm misremembering). This patch fixes the bug, so I've added it to
for-next with
Fixes: 3092eb456375 ("riscv: compat: vdso: Add setup additional pages implementation")
which I think is correct, but LMK if there's an issue.
Thanks!
(and also sorry I poked Geert instead of you about this one, oops ;))
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
>>>> + [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
>>>> + .name = "[vvar]",
>>>> + .fault = vvar_fault,
>>>> + },
>>>> + [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
>>>> + .name = "[vdso]",
>>>> + .mremap = vdso_mremap,
>>>> + },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>> .name = "compat_vdso",
>>>> .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>>>> .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
>>>> - .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>> - .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>> + .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>> + .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>> };
>>>> #endif
>>>>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list