[PATCH] riscv: add base extensions to enum riscv_isa_ext_id

[Vineet Gupta]

On 12/22/22 15:35, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 03:13:56PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>
>> On 12/22/22 14:53, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> Hi Vineet,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 02:41:04PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>>> This allows for using the enum in general to refer to any extension.
>>> What is the point of this patch? It's hard to understand the rationale
>>> without having any user, especially...
>> Right I'm trying to build a cpu feature enable API which required handling
>> of all extensions.
> Does it matter to you if it's defines or an enum, as long as every
> extension is exposed to you via the same mechanism?

No, I just went with what v6.1 release code base had.

>
>> Ideally yes this needs to go there. But it seemed more like a cleanup type
>> patch to warrant a standalone submission.
> Meh, dw. Not expecting people to know about every patch under the sun.

No this patch doesn't require people to know what series it facilitates 
since IMO it is a trivial cleanup - fixing 2 disparate ways of defining 
extensions.
And as I said it is not urgent, specially with other changes in flight.

Thx,
-Vineet