[PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:02:35PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> > > Higher Powers here, but some sort of logical ordering would probably be
> > > a good idea so as not to hold each other up?
> > > The non-string bit of your series has been fairly well reviewed & would,
> > > in theory, be mergeable once the tree re-opens? Timing aside, Jisheng's
> > > idea seems like a good one, no?
> 
> IMHO, it will be better if Palmer can merge Heiko's alternative improvements
> into riscv-next once well reviewed and the window is reopen. Then Drew,
> Prabhakar and I can rebase on that tree.

Unless I missed something, we're saying the same thing in different ways
:)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20221206/80f68058/attachment.sig>