[linux-pm] [PATCH v2] pcmcia: db1xxx-ss: suspend/resume fix

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Dominik Brodowski
> <linux at dominikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:04:50PM +0100, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> >> Dominik,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> >> >> Howdy,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Dominik Brodowski
> >> >> <linux at dominikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> >> >> > Hm, what about using two commits currently in my tree for 2.6.36 instead,
> >> >> > which should fix all socket drivers?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    power: support _noirq actions on device types and classes
> >> >> >    pcmcia: use dev_pm_ops for class pcmcia_socket_class
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Manuel: Could you try whether they also solve these issues? If so, I'd
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes it does, works on my MIPS test systems.
> >> >
> >> > I don't seem to have received the original message, so sorry for the lack of
> >> > response.
> >> >
> >> >> > propose pushing both patches already for 2.6.36. Rafael: do you concur?
> >> >
> >> > I do.  The patches look good and if they fix things for people right now,
> >> > that's a good reason to push them for .34.
> >> >
> >> >> I hope you meant 2.6.34
> >> >
> >> > I think Dominik meant .35 actually.
> >>
> >> Okay, can we apply my v2 patch to 2.6.34?  I'd like to have PM working when
> >> it gets out.
> >
> > Actually I meant .34. I'll push out my patch in the next days, if you
> > concur.
> 
> Great, I'm all for upstreaming your patch.

Agreed.

Rafael