[LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] : blktests: status, expansion plan for the storage stack test framework

[Johannes Thumshirn]

On 2/15/26 10:18 PM, Haris Iqbal wrote:
>>  From my view, blktests keep on finding kernel bugs. I think it demonstrates the
>> value of this community effort, and I'm happy about it. Said that, I find what
>> blktests can improve more, of course. Here I share the list of improvement
>> opportunities from my view point (I already mentioned the first three items).
> A possible feature for blktest could be integration with something
> like virtme-ng.
> Running on VM can be versatile and fast. The run can be made parallel
> too, by spawning multiple VMs simultaneously.

This is actually rather trivial to solve I have some pre-made things for 
fstests and that can be adopted for blktests as well:

vng \
     --user=root -v --name vng-tcmu-runner \
     -a loglevel=3 \
     --run $KDIR \
     --cpus=8 --memory=8G \
     --exec "~johannes/src/ci/run-fstests.sh" \
     --qemu-opts="-device virtio-scsi,id=scsi0 -drive 
file=/dev/sda,format=raw,if=none,id=zbc0 -device 
scsi-block,bus=scsi0.0,drive=zbc0" \
     --qemu-opts="-device virtio-scsi,id=scsi1 -drive 
file=/dev/sdb,format=raw,if=none,id=zbc1 -device 
scsi-block,bus=scsi1.0,drive=zbc1"

and run-fstests.sh is:

#!/bin/sh
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

DIR="/tmp/"
MKFS="mkfs.btrfs -f"
FSTESTS_DIR="/home/johannes/src/fstests"
HOSTCONF="$FSTESTS_DIR/configs/$(hostname -s)"
TESTDEV="$(grep TEST_DEV $HOSTCONF | cut -d '=' -f 2)"

mkdir -p $DIR/{test,scratch,results}
$MKFS $TESTDEV

cd $FSTESTS_DIR
./check -x raid

I'm not sure it'll make sense to include this into blktests other than 
maybe providing an example in the README.


Byte,

     Johannes