blktests failures with v6.19 kernel

[Chaitanya Kulkarni]

On 2/16/26 01:38, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> Hi Chaitanya,
>
> On 2/13/26 1:27 PM, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I ran the latest blktests (git hash: b5b699341102) with the v6.19 kernel. I
>> observed 6 failures listed below. Comparing with the previous report with the
>> v6.19-rc1 kernel [1], two failures were resolved (nvme/033 and srp) and three
>> failures are newly observed (nvme/061, zbd/009 and zbd/013). Recently, kmemleak
>> support was introduced to blktests. Two out of the three new failures were
>> detected by kmemleak. Your actions to fix the failures will be appreciated as
>> always.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/a078671f-10b3-47e7-acbb-4251c8744523@wdc.com/
>>
>>
>> List of failures
>> ================
>> #1: nvme/005,063 (tcp transport)
>> #2: nvme/058 (fc transport)
>> #3: nvme/061 (rdma transport, siw driver)(new)(kmemleak)
>> #4: nbd/002
>> #5: zbd/009 (new)(kmemleak)
>> #6: zbd/013 (new)
>>
>>
>> Failure description
>> ===================
>>
>> #1: nvme/005,063 (tcp transport)
>>
>>      The test case nvme/005 and 063 fail for tcp transport due to the lockdep
>>      WARN related to the three locks q->q_usage_counter, q->elevator_lock and
>>      set->srcu. Refer to the nvme/063 failure report for v6.16-rc1 kernel [2].
>>
>>      [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/4fdm37so3o4xricdgfosgmohn63aa7wj3ua4e5vpihoamwg3ui@fq42f5q5t5ic/
> For the lockdep failure reported above for nvme/063, it seems we already had
> solution but it appears that it's not yet upstreamed, check this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251125061142.18094-1-ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com/
>
> Can you please update and resend the above patch per the last feedback? I think
> this should fix the lockdep reported under nvme/063.
>
> Thanks,
> --Nilay


Thank for pointing this out.

Please allow me 2-3 days I'll send out a patch.

-ck