[PATCH RFC] scsi: qla2xxx: zero default_item last in qla24xx_free_purex_item

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

>> I see. I think it's probably better to go ahead with the revert, and then apply
>> the patch I proposed in my previous e-mail (it's more straightforward and introduces
>> fewer changes).
>>
>> If you agree with that, I can submit both the revert and the patch.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Gustavo
>>
> 
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> I just built a kernel with your patch, on top of the NVMe FPIN link
> integrity v9 patch set, and a test run on qla2xxx passes without any
> field-spanning write warnings, nor with any null pointer dereference
> errors.


Awesome. Thanks so much for testing it, Bryan. :)

Okay, so I'll go ahead and ACK the revert submitted by John (so as not
to duplicate efforts), and once it's applied, I'll submit the proposed
patch.

Thank you, folks.
-Gustavo