[PATCH] nvme/tcp: handle tls partially sent records in write_space()

Hannes Reinecke hare at suse.de
Tue Oct 7 02:51:31 PDT 2025


On 10/7/25 11:24, Wilfred Mallawa wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-10-07 at 07:19 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 10/7/25 02:46, Wilfred Mallawa wrote:
>>> From: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa at wdc.com>
>>>
>>
> [...]
>> I wonder: Do we really need to check for a partially assembled
>> record,
>> or wouldn't it be easier to call queue->write_space() every time
>> here?
>> We sure would end up with executing the callback more often, but if
>> no
>> data is present it shouldn't do any harm.
>>
>> IE just use
>>
>> if (nvme_tcp_queue_tls(queue)
>>       queue->write_space(sk);
> 
> Hey Hannes,
> 
> This was my initial approach, but I figured using
> tls_is_partially_sent_record() might be slightly more efficient. But if
> we think that's negligible, happy to go with this approach (omitting
> the partial record check).
> 
Please do.
Performance testing on NVMe-TCP is notoriously tricky, so for now we
really should not assume anything here.
And it's making the patch _vastly_ simpler, _and_ we don't have to
involve the networking folks here.
We have a similar patch for the data_ready() function in nvmet_tcp(),
and that seemed to work, too.
Nit: we don't unset the 'NOSPACE' flag there. Can you check if that's
really required? And, if it is, fixup nvmet_tcp() to unset it?
Or, if not, modify your patch to not clear it?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare at suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list