[PATCH 0/1] nvmet: add basic in-memory backend support

[Chaitanya Kulkarni]

Hi Hannes and Christoph,


On 11/5/25 05:14, hch at lst.de wrote:
> But what is the use that requires removing all that overhead / indirection?
>
> I think you need to describe that very clearly to make a case.  And
> maybe drop a lot of the marketing sounding overly dramatatic language
> that really does not help the case.

the quantitative data that proves removing all overhead/indirection
gives better performance for nvmet-mem-backend against null_blk
membacked and brd. Here is the link for the comparative data :-

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ckoolkarni/nvmet-mem-brd-null-blk-perf/refs/heads/main/README.md 
I'll update the git commit log if this is acceptable along with other 
comments. -ck