[PATCH v6 0/9] blk: honor isolcpus configuration
Ming Lei
ming.lei at redhat.com
Mon May 5 20:17:58 PDT 2025
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:19:39PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> I've added back the isolcpus io_queue agrument. This avoids any semantic
> changes of managed_irq.
IMO, this is correct thing to do.
> I don't like it but I haven't found a
> better way to deal with it. Ming clearly stated managed_irq should not
> change.
Precisely, we can't cause io hang and break existing managed_irq applications,
especially you know there isn't kernel solution for it, same for v5, v6 or
whatever.
I will look at v6 this week.
Thanks,
Ming
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list