[PATCH 0/2] nvme: handle partially unique NID value
Keith Busch
kbusch at kernel.org
Fri May 2 20:46:06 PDT 2025
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 11:26:47PM +0000, Judy Brock wrote:
> For example, both companies have "admitted failure" but you haven't
> heard it: the FW in question definitely has a defect. Neither company
> is holding it out as compliant. Both companies have indicated going
> forward, the defective behavior has been corrected.
>
> Not sure why you keep saying that neither company is willing to fix it.
I'm a little confused. If the conflicting behavior has been corrected,
why is this being discussed here? A device side fix is surely the best
possible outcome for everyone here. Requiring a kernel upgrade to work
around undesirable firmware behavior is a bit unpleasant for end users
when you already have a solution that works with any nvme capable OS. ?
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list