[PATCH v8 8/8] nvme-multipath: queue-depth support for marginal paths

[Muneendra Kumar]

Correct me if iam wrong.
>>. In the case where 
>> all paths are marginal and no optimized or non-optimized path is 
>> found, we fall back to __nvme_find_path which selects the best marginal path

With the current patch __nvme_find_path will allways picks the path from non-optimized path ?

Regards,
Muneendra


>On 7/10/25 00:03, John Meneghini wrote:
>> Hannes, this patch fixes the queue-depth scheduler.  Please take a look.
>> 
>> On 7/9/25 5:26 PM, Bryan Gurney wrote:
>>> From: John Meneghini <jmeneghi at redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Exclude marginal paths from queue-depth io policy. In the case where 
>>> all paths are marginal and no optimized or non-optimized path is 
>>> found, we fall back to __nvme_find_path which selects the best marginal path.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Bryan Gurney <bgurney at redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Meneghini <jmeneghi at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/ 
>>> multipath.c index 8d4e54bb4261..767583e8454b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> @@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ static struct nvme_ns 
>>> *nvme_queue_depth_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>>>           if (nvme_path_is_disabled(ns))
>>>               continue;
>>> +        if (nvme_ctrl_is_marginal(ns->ctrl))
>>> +            continue;
>>> +
>>>           depth = atomic_read(&ns->ctrl->nr_active);
>>>           switch (ns->ana_state) {
>>> @@ -443,7 +446,9 @@ static struct nvme_ns 
>>> *nvme_queue_depth_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>>>               return best_opt;
>>>       }
>>> -    return best_opt ? best_opt : best_nonopt;
>>> +    best_opt = (best_opt) ? best_opt : best_nonopt;
>>> +
>>> +    return best_opt ? best_opt : __nvme_find_path(head, 
>>> +numa_node_id());
>>>   }
>>>   static inline bool nvme_path_is_optimized(struct nvme_ns *ns)
>> 
>
>Hmm. Not convinced. I would expect a 'marginal' path to behave different
>(performance-wise) than unaffected paths. And the queue-depth scheduler should be able to handle paths with different performance characteristics just fine.
>(Is is possible that your results are test artifacts? I guess your tool just injects FPIN messages with no performance impact, resulting in this behaviour...)
>
>But if you want to exclude marginal paths from queue depth:
>by all means, go for it.
>



-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.