[PATCH 1/2] nvmet: make 'readonly' setting configurable
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Thu Apr 3 23:21:26 PDT 2025
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:44:55AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > + mutex_lock(&ns->subsys->lock);
> > + if (ns->enabled) {
> > + pr_err("the ns:%d is already enabled.\n", ns->nsid);
> > + mutex_unlock(&ns->subsys->lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + ns->readonly = val;
> > + mutex_unlock(&ns->subsys->lock);
>
> Not sure how people feel about the "cleanup" constructs. If we're okay
> using them in this driver, this is a simple use case for the guard to
> manage the mutex:
>
> guard(mutex)(&ns->subsys->lock);
>
> And then you don't need to worry about unlocking.
I really hate it with passion as the syntax is so butt ugly and has
no explicit unlock point. Why couldn't folks at least do the simple
python thing:
with (mutex(&ns->subsys->lock)) {
if (ns->enabled) {
pr_err("the ns:%d is already enabled.\n",
ns->nsid);
mutex_unlock(&ns->subsys->lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
ns->readonly = val;
}
>
> > + return count;
> > +}
---end quoted text---
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list