[PATCH v1 1/1] nvme: add admin controller support. prohibit ioq creation for admin & disco ctrlrs
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Wed Apr 2 21:49:01 PDT 2025
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 09:03:11AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Kamaljit Singh wrote:
> > -static inline bool nvme_discovery_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> > -{
> > - return ctrl->opts && ctrl->opts->discovery_nqn;
> > -}
> > -
>
> I suppose it's fine to rename this function with an nvmf_ prefix, but
> it's not really related to the rest of the patch and makes the diff
> larger than necessary.
It isn't, nvmf_ is really for code in the fabrics library and not used
by core code.
> > + /* An admin or discovery controller has one admin queue, but no I/O queues */
> > + if (nvme_admin_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl) || nvmf_discovery_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl)) {
> > + ctrl->ctrl.queue_count = 1;
> > + } else if (ctrl->ctrl.queue_count < 2) {
> > + /* I/O controller with no I/O queues is not allowed */
> > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + dev_err(ctrl->ctrl.device,
> > + "I/O controller doesn't allow zero I/O queues!\n");
> > + goto destroy_admin;
> > + }
>
> The queue_count comes from the user. If the user provides a bad value
> for an IO controller, you're erroring. If they provide a bad value for a
> discovery or admin controller, you override the value. Why the different
> behavior?
Also we historically do allow I/O controllers without I/O queues to
allow for various kinds of recovery action. So I don't think we
should change that.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list