[PATCH v5 3/5] fcntl: add F_{SET/GET}_RW_HINT_EX

[Bart Van Assche]

On 9/10/24 8:01 AM, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/rw_hint.h b/include/linux/rw_hint.h
> index b9942f5f13d3..ff708a75e2f6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rw_hint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rw_hint.h
> @@ -21,4 +21,17 @@ enum rw_lifetime_hint {
>   static_assert(sizeof(enum rw_lifetime_hint) == 1);
>   #endif
>   
> +#define WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT	BIT(7)
> +#define WRITE_HINT_VAL_MASK	(WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT - 1)
> +#define WRITE_HINT_TYPE(h)	(((h) & WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT) ? \
> +				TYPE_RW_PLACEMENT_HINT : TYPE_RW_LIFETIME_HINT)
> +#define WRITE_HINT_VAL(h)	((h) & WRITE_HINT_VAL_MASK)
> +
> +#define WRITE_PLACEMENT_HINT(h)	(((h) & WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT) ? \
> +				 WRITE_HINT_VAL(h) : 0)
> +#define WRITE_LIFETIME_HINT(h)	(((h) & WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT) ? \
> +				 0 : WRITE_HINT_VAL(h))
> +
> +#define PLACEMENT_HINT_TYPE	WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT
> +#define MAX_PLACEMENT_HINT_VAL	(WRITE_HINT_VAL_MASK - 1)
>   #endif /* _LINUX_RW_HINT_H */

The above macros implement a union of two 7-bit types in an 8-bit field.
Wouldn't we be better of by using two separate 8-bit values such that we
don't need the above macros?

Thanks,

Bart.