[PATCH RFC 3/4] block: Support atomic writes limits for stacked devices
John Garry
john.g.garry at oracle.com
Thu Sep 12 08:05:48 PDT 2024
On 12/09/2024 14:16, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:07:47PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> + } else if (t->features & BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES) {
>> + t->atomic_write_hw_max = min_not_zero(t->atomic_write_hw_max,
>> + b->atomic_write_hw_max);
>> + t->atomic_write_boundary_sectors =
>> + min_not_zero(t->atomic_write_boundary_sectors,
>> + b->atomic_write_boundary_sectors);
>> + t->atomic_write_hw_unit_min = max(t->atomic_write_hw_unit_min,
>> + b->atomic_write_hw_unit_min);
>> + t->atomic_write_hw_unit_max =
>> + min_not_zero(t->atomic_write_hw_unit_max,
>> + b->atomic_write_hw_unit_max);
>
> Maybe split this into a helper to make the code more readable?
Yeah, I will do.
I was reworking this anyway.
So far I am not supporting a stripe unit with which is not a power-of-2.
But that is too restrictive. And lifting that restriction makes
calculating atomic write limits more complicated.
>
> Otherwise this looks good to me.
cheers
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list