[PATCHv3 08/10] blk-integrity: remove inappropriate limit checks
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Wed Sep 11 01:18:46 PDT 2024
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:21:09AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> I was hoping to not introduce another queue limit for the metadata
> virt_boundary_mask. We could remove the virt_boundary from the NVMe PCI
> driver if it supports SGL's and then we're fine. But we're commiting to
> that data format for all IO even if PRP might have been more efficient.
> That might be alright, though.
The real question is if we actually want that. If we want to take
fully advantage of the new dma mapping API that Leon is proposing we'd
need to impose a similar limit. And a lot of these super tiny SGL
segments probably aren't very efficient to start with. Something that
bounce buffers a page worth of PI tuples might end up beeing more
efficient in the end.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list