[PATCH 2/2] nvme-multipath: fix I/O stall when remapping namespaces

Nilay Shroff nilay at linux.ibm.com
Wed Sep 4 23:41:36 PDT 2024



On 9/4/24 21:25, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 9/4/24 16:52, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/24 23:33, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> During repetitive namespace remapping operations (ie removing a namespace and
>>> provision a different namespace with the same NSID) on the target the
>>> namespace might have changed between the time the initial scan
>>> was performed, and partition scan was invoked by device_add_disk()
>>> in nvme_mpath_set_live(). We then end up with a stuck scanning process:
>>>
>>> [<0>] folio_wait_bit_common+0x12a/0x310
>>> [<0>] filemap_read_folio+0x97/0xd0
>>> [<0>] do_read_cache_folio+0x108/0x390
>>> [<0>] read_part_sector+0x31/0xa0
>>> [<0>] read_lba+0xc5/0x160
>>> [<0>] efi_partition+0xd9/0x8f0
>>> [<0>] bdev_disk_changed+0x23d/0x6d0
>>> [<0>] blkdev_get_whole+0x78/0xc0
>>> [<0>] bdev_open+0x2c6/0x3b0
>>> [<0>] bdev_file_open_by_dev+0xcb/0x120
>>> [<0>] disk_scan_partitions+0x5d/0x100
>>> [<0>] device_add_disk+0x402/0x420
>>> [<0>] nvme_mpath_set_live+0x4f/0x1f0 [nvme_core]
>>> [<0>] nvme_mpath_add_disk+0x107/0x120 [nvme_core]
>>> [<0>] nvme_alloc_ns+0xac6/0xe60 [nvme_core]
>>> [<0>] nvme_scan_ns+0x2dd/0x3e0 [nvme_core]
>>> [<0>] nvme_scan_work+0x1a3/0x490 [nvme_core]
>>>
>>> This happens when we have several paths, some of which are inaccessible,
>>> and the active paths are removed first. Then nvme_find_path() will requeue
>>> I/O in the ns_head (as paths are present), but the requeue list is never
>>> triggered as all remaining paths are inactive.
>>> This patch checks for NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE when selecting a path,
>>> and requeue I/O after NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE has been cleared once
>>> the last path has been removed to properly terminate pending I/O.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> index c9d23b1b8efc..1b1deb0450ab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> @@ -407,6 +407,9 @@ static struct nvme_ns *nvme_numa_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>>>     inline struct nvme_ns *nvme_find_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>>>   {
>>> +    if (!test_bit(NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE, &head->flags))
>>> +        return NULL;
>>> +
>>>       switch (READ_ONCE(head->subsys->iopolicy)) {
>>>       case NVME_IOPOLICY_QD:
>>>           return nvme_queue_depth_path(head);
>>> @@ -421,6 +424,9 @@ static bool nvme_available_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>>>   {
>>>       struct nvme_ns *ns;
>>>   +    if (!test_bit(NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE, &head->flags))
>>> +        return NULL;
>>> +
>>>       list_for_each_entry_rcu(ns, &head->list, siblings) {
>>>           if (test_bit(NVME_CTRL_FAILFAST_EXPIRED, &ns->ctrl->flags))
>>>               continue;
>>> @@ -967,11 +973,15 @@ void nvme_mpath_shutdown_disk(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>>>   {
>>>       if (!head->disk)
>>>           return;
>>> -    kblockd_schedule_work(&head->requeue_work);
>>> -    if (test_bit(NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE, &head->flags)) {
>>> +    if (test_and_clear_bit(NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE, &head->flags)) {
>>>           nvme_cdev_del(&head->cdev, &head->cdev_device);
>>>           del_gendisk(head->disk);
>>>       }
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * requeue I/O after NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE has been cleared
>>> +     * to allow multipath to fail all I/O.
>>> +     */
>>> +    kblockd_schedule_work(&head->requeue_work);
>>>   }
>> Not sure, in your case, whether nvme_mpath_remove_disk() is called or not?
>> The nvme_mpath_remove_disk() shall trigger the ns_head reqiest list.
>>
> It would, but we're never get this far as the reference to ns_head it held by the above stack trace (and nvme_mpath_remove_disk()) is called
> when the last reference to ns_head drops.
OK, I see. In that case, I believe checking NVME_NS_READY in nvme_avalibale_path() should 
be a  good idea. 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes

Thanks,
--Nilay



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list