blktests failures with v6.12-rc1 kernel

[Zhu Yanjun]

在 2024/10/5 0:31, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> On 10/4/24 5:40 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> So I add a jiffies (u64) value into the name.
>
> I don't think that embedding the value of the jiffies counter in the 
> kmem cache names is sufficient to make cache names unique. That sounds 
> like a fragile approach to me.

Sorry. I can not get you. Why jiffies counter is not sufficient to make 
cache names unique? And why is it a fragile approach?

Can you share your advice with us?

I read your latest commit. In your commit, the ida is used to make cache 
names unique. It is a good approach if it can fix this problem.

The approach of jiffies seems clumsy. But it seems to be able to fix 
this problem, too. I can not see any risks about this jiffies appraoch.

Zhu Yanjun

>
> Bart.

-- 
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu