don't reorder requests passed to ->queue_rqs

[Jens Axboe]

On 11/13/24 3:23 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 11/13/2024 12:51 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Looks good to me. I ran the quick performance numbers [1].
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni<kch at nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> -ck
>>>
>>> fio randread iouring workload :-
>>>
>>> IOPS :-
>>> -------
>>> nvme-orig:           Average IOPS: 72,690
>>> nvme-new-no-reorder: Average IOPS: 72,580
>>>
>>> BW :-
>>> -------
>>> nvme-orig:           Average BW: 283.9 MiB/s
>>> nvme-new-no-reorder: Average BW: 283.4 MiB/s
>> Thanks for testing, but you can't verify any kind of perf change with
>> that kind of setup. I'll be willing to bet that it'll be 1-2% drop at
>> higher rates, which is substantial. But the reordering is a problem, not
>> just for zoned devices, which is why I chose to merge this.
>>
>> -- Jens Axboe
> 
> Agree with you. My intention was to test it, since it was touching NVMe,
> I thought sharing results will help either way with io_uring?
> but no intention to stop this patchset and make an argument
> against it (if at all) for potential drop :).

Oh all good, and like I said, the testing is appreciated! The functional
testing is definitely useful.

-- 
Jens Axboe