[PATCHv4 13/13] nvmet: report ns's vwc not present

Guixin Liu kanie at linux.alibaba.com
Sat Nov 9 07:00:32 PST 2024


在 2024/11/9 22:59, Guixin Liu 写道:
>
> 在 2024/11/9 00:15, Keith Busch 写道:
>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:27:43PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:38:48AM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c 
>>>> b/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c
>>>> index 516af7b419189..f688d7fdf7d67 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c
>>>> @@ -915,6 +915,9 @@ static void nvmet_execute_id_cs_indep(struct 
>>>> nvmet_req *req)
>>>>           id->nsattr |= NVME_NS_ATTR_RO;
>>>>       if (req->ns->bdev && !bdev_nonrot(req->ns->bdev))
>>>>           id->nsfeat |= NVME_NS_ROTATIONAL;
>>>> +    if ((req->ns->file && !req->ns->buffered_io) ||
>>> I don't think this check is correct.  Direct I/O still requires cache
>>> flushes for durability.
>> Oh, right. Would it be sufficient to check the file's block device for
>> write caching?
>>
>>     if ((req->ns->file && !req->ns->buffered_io &&
>> bdev_write_cache(file_inode(req->ns->file)->i_sb->s_bdev))
>
> Or just remove !req->ns->buffered_io check? All file backend return
>
> support vwc.
Sorry, remove "req->ns->file && !req->ns->buffered_io".
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Guixin Liu
>



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list