[PATCH] nvme: test nvmet-wq sysfs interface
Daniel Wagner
dwagner at suse.de
Wed Nov 6 04:13:28 PST 2024
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:46:26AM GMT, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 11/4/24 23:02, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:29:07AM GMT, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> >> +# Test nvmet-wq cpumask sysfs attribute with NVMe-oF and fio workload
> > What do you want to test here? What's the objective? I don't see any
> > block layer related parts or do I miss something?
>
> For NVMeOF target we have exported nvmet-wq to userspace with
> recent patch. This behavior is new and I don't think there is any test
> exists that runs the fio workload while changing the CPUMASK randomly
> to ensure the stability for nvmet-wq when application is using the block
> layer. Hence we need the test for latest patch we have added to the
> 6.13.
Though this is not a performance measurement just a functional testing if
the scheduler works. I don't think we should add such tests
because it will add to the overall runtime for little benefit. I am
pretty sure there already tests (e.g. kunit) which do more elaborate
scheduler tests.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list