fine-grained PI control
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Mon Jul 29 10:03:08 PDT 2024
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 03:51:56PM +0530, Anuj Gupta wrote:
>
> I was thinking something like below patch[*] could help us get rid of the
> BIP_USER_CHECK_FOO flags, and also driver can now check flags passed by block
> layer instead of checking if it's user passthrough data. Haven't plumbed the
> scsi side of things, but do you think it can work with scsi?
>
> Subject: [PATCH] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags
>
> This patch introduces BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags which
> indicate how the hardware should check the payload. The driver can now
> just rely on block layer flags, and doesn't need to know the integrity
> source. Submitter of PI chooses which tags to check. This would also
> give us a unified interface for user and kernel generated integrity.
This looks reasonably to me for the in-kernel interface. We'll still
need to deal with the fact that SCSI is a bit selective in what
combination of these flags it actually allows.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list