[PATCH 8/9] nvmet-tcp: support secure channel concatenation

Hannes Reinecke hare at suse.de
Thu Jul 25 04:50:19 PDT 2024


On 7/23/24 03:48, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 04:21:21PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> +	ret = nvme_auth_generate_digest(sq->ctrl->shash_id, psk, psk_len,
>> +					sq->ctrl->subsysnqn,
>> +					sq->ctrl->hostnqn, &digest);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		pr_warn("%s: ctrl %d qid %d failed to generate digest, error %d\n",
>> +			__func__, sq->ctrl->cntlid, sq->qid, ret);
>> +		goto out_free_psk;
>> +	}
>> +	ret = nvme_auth_derive_tls_psk(sq->ctrl->shash_id, psk, psk_len,
>> +				       digest, &tls_psk);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		pr_warn("%s: ctrl %d qid %d failed to derive TLS PSK, error %d\n",
>> +			__func__, sq->ctrl->cntlid, sq->qid, ret);
>> +		goto out_free_digest;
>> +	}
> 
> This reuses 'psk' as both an HMAC key and as input keying material for HKDF.
> It's *probably* still secure, but this violates cryptographic best practices in
> that it reuses a key for multiple purposes.  Is this a defect in the spec?
> 
This is using a digest calculated from the actual PSK key material, 
true. You are right that with that we probably impact cryptographic
reliability, but that that is what the spec mandates.

Actual reason for this modification was the need to identify the TLS 
PSKs for each connection, _and_ support key refresh.

We identify TLS PSKs by the combination of '<hash> <hostnqn> 
<subsysnqn>', where '<hostnqn>' is the identification of the
initiator (source), and '<subsynqn>' the identification of the
target. But as we regenerate the PSK for each reset we are having
a hard time identifying the newly generated PSK by the original
'<hash> <hostnqn> <subsysnqn>' tuple only.
We cannot delete the original TLS PSK directly as it might be used
by other connections, so there will be a time where both PSKs
are valid and have to be stored in the keyring.

And keeping a global 'revision' counter is horrible, the alternative
of having a per-connection instance counter is similarly unpleasant.

Not ideal, true, so if you have better ideas I'd like to hear them.

But thanks for your consideration. I'll be bringing them up.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare at suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich




More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list