[PATCH blktests v3 10/15] nvme/{006,008,010,012,014,019,023}: support NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES

Sagi Grimberg sagi at grimberg.me
Sun Apr 28 06:12:49 PDT 2024



On 28/04/2024 13:32, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2024 / 11:58, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>
>> On 24/04/2024 10:59, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>>> Enable repeated test runs for the listed test cases for
>>> NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES. Modify the set_conditions() hooks to call
>>> _set_nvme_trtype_and_nvmet_blkdev_type() instead of _set_nvmet_trtype()
>>> so that the test cases are repeated for listed conditions in
>>> NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES and NVMET_TRTYPES.
>>>
>>> The default values of NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES is (device file). With this
>>> default set up, each of the listed test cases are run twice. The second
>>> runs of the test cases for 'file' blkdev type do exact same test as
>>> other test cases nvme/007, 009, 011, 013, 015, 020 and 024.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner at suse.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch at nvidia.com>
>>> Acked-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty at samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki at wdc.com>
>>> ---
>>>    tests/nvme/006 | 2 +-
>>>    tests/nvme/008 | 2 +-
>>>    tests/nvme/010 | 2 +-
>>>    tests/nvme/012 | 2 +-
>>>    tests/nvme/014 | 2 +-
>>>    tests/nvme/019 | 2 +-
>>>    tests/nvme/023 | 2 +-
>>>    7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/nvme/006 b/tests/nvme/006
>>> index ff0a9eb..c543b40 100755
>>> --- a/tests/nvme/006
>>> +++ b/tests/nvme/006
>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ requires() {
>>>    }
>>>    set_conditions() {
>>> -	_set_nvme_trtype "$@"
>>> +	_set_nvme_trtype_and_nvmet_blkdev_type "$@"
>> Why not calling separate functions? having func do_a_and_b interface is not
>> great.
> In this case, we want to repeat the test cases to cover combination of two
> conditions: M trtypes and N blkdev_types. The test case should be repeated to
> cover all of M x N matrix elements, then the hook set_conditions() should
> iterate the elements. I can not think of the way to handle this iteration with
> separated two functions.

What happens when you add another condition to iterate against, you 
introduce set_a_and_b_and_c interface?



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list