[PATCH v5 0/6] nvme-fabrics: short-circuit connect retries
Keith Busch
kbusch at kernel.org
Fri Apr 12 08:24:21 PDT 2024
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:24:04AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 06:35:25PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:35:04AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > > The first patch returns only kernel error codes now and avoids overwriting error
> > > codes later. Thje newly introduced helper for deciding if a reconnect should be
> > > attempted is the only place where we have the logic (and documentation).
> > >
> > > On the target side I've separate the nvme status from the dhchap status handling
> > > which made it a bit clearer. I was tempted to refactor the code in
> > > nvmet_execute_auth_send to avoid hitting the 80 chars limit but didn't came up
> > > with something nice yet. So let's keep this change at a minimum before any
> > > refactoring attempts.
> > >
> > > I've tested with blktests and also an real hardware for nvme-fc.
> >
> > Thanks, series applied to nvme-6.9.
>
> Thanks! I have an updated version here which addresses some of Sagi's
> feedback, e.g. using only one helper function. Sorry I didn't send out
> it earlier, I got a bit side tracked in testing because of the 'funky'
> results with RDMA.
>
> Do you want me to send a complete fresh series or patches on top of this
> series? I'm fine either way.
Oh sorry, I didn't notice the discussion carried on after the "review"
tag. Please send me the update, I'll force push.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list