[PATCH v2 1/1] nvme-pci: clamp max_hw_sectors based on DMA optimized limitation
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Wed May 3 09:17:59 PDT 2023
dma_opt_mapping_size falls back to and is bound by dma_max_mapping_size.
So I think we could just do this:
---
>From 3710e2b056cb92ad816e4d79fa54a6a5b6ad8cbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12 at lenovo.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:08:00 +0800
Subject: nvme-pci: clamp max_hw_sectors based on DMA optimized limitation
When running the fio test on a 448-core AMD server + a NVME disk,
a soft lockup or a hard lockup call trace is shown:
[soft lockup]
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#126 stuck for 23s! [swapper/126:0]
RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x21/0x50
...
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
fq_flush_timeout+0x7d/0xd0
? __pfx_fq_flush_timeout+0x10/0x10
call_timer_fn+0x2e/0x150
run_timer_softirq+0x48a/0x560
? __pfx_fq_flush_timeout+0x10/0x10
? clockevents_program_event+0xaf/0x130
__do_softirq+0xf1/0x335
irq_exit_rcu+0x9f/0xd0
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb4/0xd0
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1f/0x30
...
Obvisouly, fq_flush_timeout spends over 20 seconds. Here is ftrace log:
| fq_flush_timeout() {
| fq_ring_free() {
| put_pages_list() {
0.170 us | free_unref_page_list();
0.810 us | }
| free_iova_fast() {
| free_iova() {
* 85622.66 us | _raw_spin_lock_irqsave();
2.860 us | remove_iova();
0.600 us | _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore();
0.470 us | lock_info_report();
2.420 us | free_iova_mem.part.0();
* 85638.27 us | }
* 85638.84 us | }
| put_pages_list() {
0.230 us | free_unref_page_list();
0.470 us | }
... ...
$ 31017069 us | }
Most of cores are under lock contention for acquiring iova_rbtree_lock due
to the iova flush queue mechanism.
[hard lockup]
NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 351
RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x2d8/0x330
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4f/0x60
free_iova+0x27/0xd0
free_iova_fast+0x4d/0x1d0
fq_ring_free+0x9b/0x150
iommu_dma_free_iova+0xb4/0x2e0
__iommu_dma_unmap+0x10b/0x140
iommu_dma_unmap_sg+0x90/0x110
dma_unmap_sg_attrs+0x4a/0x50
nvme_unmap_data+0x5d/0x120 [nvme]
nvme_pci_complete_batch+0x77/0xc0 [nvme]
nvme_irq+0x2ee/0x350 [nvme]
? __pfx_nvme_pci_complete_batch+0x10/0x10 [nvme]
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x53/0x1a0
handle_irq_event_percpu+0x19/0x60
handle_irq_event+0x3d/0x60
handle_edge_irq+0xb3/0x210
__common_interrupt+0x7f/0x150
common_interrupt+0xc5/0xf0
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_common_interrupt+0x2b/0x40
...
ftrace shows fq_ring_free spends over 10 seconds [1]. Again, most of
cores are under lock contention for acquiring iova_rbtree_lock due
to the iova flush queue mechanism.
[Root Cause]
The root cause is that the max_hw_sectors_kb of nvme disk (mdts=10)
is 4096kb, which streaming DMA mappings cannot benefit from the
scalable IOVA mechanism introduced by the commit 9257b4a206fc
("iommu/iova: introduce per-cpu caching to iova allocation") if
the length is greater than 128kb.
To fix the lock contention issue, clamp max_hw_sectors based on
DMA optimized limitation in order to leverage scalable IOVA mechanism.
Note: The issue does not happen with another NVME disk (mdts = 5
and max_hw_sectors_kb = 128)
[1] https://gist.github.com/AdrianHuang/bf8ec7338204837631fbdaed25d19cc4
Suggested-by: Keith Busch <kbusch at kernel.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Jiwei Sun <sunjw10 at lenovo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12 at lenovo.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
---
drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index 18ca1e3ae07086..922ffe4e28222a 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -2956,7 +2956,7 @@ static struct nvme_dev *nvme_pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev,
* over a single page.
*/
dev->ctrl.max_hw_sectors = min_t(u32,
- NVME_MAX_KB_SZ << 1, dma_max_mapping_size(&pdev->dev) >> 9);
+ NVME_MAX_KB_SZ << 1, dma_opt_mapping_size(&pdev->dev) >> 9);
dev->ctrl.max_segments = NVME_MAX_SEGS;
/*
--
2.39.2
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list