[PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS

[Sagi Grimberg]

>>>> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>> Sagi, I _think_ a stable branch with this should be doable,
>>>> would you like one, or no rush?
>>>
>>> I guess a stable branch would not be too bad; I've got another
>>> set of patches for the NVMe side, too.
>>> Sagi?
>>
>> I don't think there is a real need for this to go to stable, nothing
>> is using it. Perhaps the MSG_EOR patches can go to stable in case
>> there is some userspace code that wants to rely on it.
> 
> I'm probably using the wrong word. I mean a branch based on -rc3 that's
> not going to get rebased so the commits IDs match and we can both pull
> it in. Not stable as in Greg KH.

Are you aiming this for 6.5 ? We are unlikely to get the nvme bits in
this round. I also don't think there is a conflict so the nvme bits
can go in for 6.6 and later the nvme tree will pull the tls updates.