[PATCH v12 08/26] nvme-tcp: Add DDP data-path
Aurelien Aptel
aaptel at nvidia.com
Mon Aug 14 09:12:47 PDT 2023
Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me> writes:
> On 7/12/23 19:14, Aurelien Aptel wrote:
>> +static int nvme_tcp_req_map_ddp_sg(struct nvme_tcp_request *req, struct request *rq)
>
> Why do you pass both req and rq? You can derive each from the other.
Thanks, we will remove the redundant parameter.
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + req->ddp.sg_table.sgl = req->ddp.first_sgl;
>> + ret = sg_alloc_table_chained(&req->ddp.sg_table,
>> + blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq),
>> + req->ddp.sg_table.sgl, SG_CHUNK_SIZE);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + req->ddp.nents = blk_rq_map_sg(rq->q, rq, req->ddp.sg_table.sgl);
>
> General question, I'm assuming that the hca knows how to deal with
> a controller that sends c2hdata in parts?
Yes, the hardware supports the offloading of multiple c2hdata PDUs per IO.
>> +static int nvme_tcp_setup_ddp(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, u16 command_id,
>> + struct request *rq)
>
> I think you can use nvme_cid(rq) instead of passing the command_id.
Thanks, we will use it.
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *netdev = queue->ctrl->offloading_netdev;
>> + struct nvme_tcp_request *req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (rq_data_dir(rq) != READ ||
>> + queue->ctrl->offload_io_threshold > blk_rq_payload_bytes(rq))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + req->ddp.command_id = command_id;
>> + ret = nvme_tcp_req_map_ddp_sg(req, rq);
>
> Don't see why map_ddp_sg is not open-coded here, its the only call-site,
> and its pretty much does exactly what its called.
Sure, we will open code it.
>> @@ -1308,6 +1407,15 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_send_cmd_pdu(struct nvme_tcp_request *req)
>> else
>> msg.msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
>>
>> + if (test_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_OFF_DDP, &queue->flags)) {
>> + ret = nvme_tcp_setup_ddp(queue, pdu->cmd.common.command_id,
>> + blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(req));
>> + WARN_ONCE(ret, "ddp setup failed (queue 0x%x, cid 0x%x, ret=%d)",
>> + nvme_tcp_queue_id(queue),
>> + pdu->cmd.common.command_id,
>> + ret);
>> + }
>
> Any reason why this is done here when sending the command pdu and not
> in setup time?
We wish to interact with the HW from the same CPU per queue, hence we
are calling setup_ddp() after queue->io_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()
was checked in nvme_tcp_queue_request().
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list