[PATCH blktests v2 1/2] nvme-rc: Cleanup fc ports in reverse order

[Shinichiro Kawasaki]

On Apr 19, 2023 / 12:41, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/19/23 11:47, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > We need to free the resources in the opposite order as we allocate them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner at suse.de>
> > ---
> >   tests/nvme/rc | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/nvme/rc b/tests/nvme/rc
> > index b44239446dcf..ec0cc2d8d8cc 100644
> > --- a/tests/nvme/rc
> > +++ b/tests/nvme/rc
> > @@ -204,10 +204,10 @@ _cleanup_fcloop() {
> >   	local remote_wwnn="${3:-$def_remote_wwnn}"
> >   	local remote_wwpn="${4:-$def_remote_wwpn}"
> > -	_nvme_fcloop_del_rport "${local_wwnn}" "${local_wwpn}" \
> > -			       "${remote_wwnn}" "${remote_wwpn}"
> >   	_nvme_fcloop_del_tport "${remote_wwnn}" "${remote_wwpn}"
> >   	_nvme_fcloop_del_lport "${local_wwnn}" "${local_wwpn}"
> > +	_nvme_fcloop_del_rport "${local_wwnn}" "${local_wwpn}" \
> > +			       "${remote_wwnn}" "${remote_wwpn}"
> >   }
> >   _cleanup_nvmet() {
> 
> Does this fix a bug? if it does, than it should probably be documented
> that there is a driver bug because userspace teardown ordering should
> not trigger a driver bug.

I think this fixes a bug, and it can be a left work to add another new test
case. Daniel, what do you think?