nvme-tcp request timeouts

[Seth Forshee]

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 08:19:47PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 10/11/22 13:14, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 07:30:56PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> >> Hi Seth,
> >>
> >> On 10/11/22 08:31, Seth Forshee wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm seeing timeouts like the following from nvme-tcp:
> >>>
> >>> [ 6369.513269] nvme nvme5: queue 102: timeout request 0x73 type 4
> >>> [ 6369.513283] nvme nvme5: starting error recovery
> >>> [ 6369.514379] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514385] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514392] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514393] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514401] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514414] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514420] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514427] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514430] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514432] block nvme5n1: no usable path - requeuing I/O
> >>> [ 6369.514926] nvme nvme5: Reconnecting in 10 seconds...
> >>> [ 6379.761015] nvme nvme5: creating 128 I/O queues.
> >>> [ 6379.944389] nvme nvme5: mapped 128/0/0 default/read/poll queues.
> >>> [ 6379.947922] nvme nvme5: Successfully reconnected (1 attempt)
> >>>
> >>> This is with 6.0, using nvmet-tcp on a different machine as the target.
> >>> I've seen this sporadically with several test cases. The fio fio-rand-RW
> >>> example test is a pretty good reproducer when numjobs in increased (I'm
> >>> setting it equal to the number of CPUs in the system).
> >>>
> >>> Let me know what I can do to help debug this. I'm currently adding some
> >>> tracing to the driver to see if I can get an idea of the sequence of
> >>> events that leads to this problem.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Seth
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can you bisect it ? that will help to understand the commit causing
> >> issue.
> > 
> > I don't know of any "good" version right now. I started with a 5.10
> > kernel and saw this, and tested 6.0 and still see it. I found several
> > commits since 5.10 which fix some kind of timeouts:
> > 
> > a0fdd1418007 nvme-tcp: rerun io_work if req_list is not empty
> > 70f437fb4395 nvme-tcp: fix io_work priority inversion
> > 3770a42bb8ce nvme-tcp: fix regression that causes sporadic requests to time out
> > 
> > 5.10 still has timeouts with these backported, so whatever the problem
> > is it has existed at least that long. I suppose I could go back to older
> > kernels with these backported if that's going to be the best path
> > forward here.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Seth
> 
> Can you please share the fio config you are using ?

Sure. Note that I can reproduce it with a lower number of numjobs, but
higher numbers make it easier, so I set it to the number of CPUs present
on the system I'm using to test.


[global]
name=fio-rand-RW
filename=fio-rand-RW
rw=randrw
rwmixread=60
rwmixwrite=40
bs=4K
direct=0
numjobs=128
time_based
runtime=900

[file1]
size=10G
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=16