[PATCH v2 2/3] nvme-tcp: support specifying the congestion-control
Mingbao Sun
sunmingbao at tom.com
Wed Mar 30 00:31:17 PDT 2022
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:33:53 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 10:48:06 +0800 Mingbao Sun wrote:
> > A server in a data-center with the following 2 NICs:
> >
> > - NIC_fron-end, for interacting with clients through WAN
> > (high latency, ms-level)
> >
> > - NIC_back-end, for interacting with NVMe/TCP target through LAN
> > (low latency, ECN-enabled, ideal for dctcp)
> >
> > This server interacts with clients (handling requests) via the fron-end
> > network and accesses the NVMe/TCP storage via the back-end network.
> > This is a normal use case, right?
>
> Well, if you have clearly separated networks you can set the congestion
> control algorithm per route, right? man ip-route, search congctl.
Cool, many thanks for the education.
I verified this approach, and it did work well.
And I furtherly found the commit
‘net: tcp: add per route congestion control’ which just
addresses the requirement of this scenario (separated network).
So with this approach, the requirements of our use case are
roughly satisfied.
Thanks again ^_^
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list