[PATCH] nvme-pci: trigger disk activity LED
Enzo Matsumiya
ematsumiya at suse.de
Mon Feb 28 19:30:01 PST 2022
On 02/28, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 2/28/22 2:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> I don't think we should add code to the absolutel fast path for
>> blinkenlights.
>
>Agree. It'd be a lot better to put the cost on the led trigger
>side, and not need anything in the fast path for block devices.
>Monitor disk stats, or something like that.
There's been at least 4 attempts to do so, as far as I'm aware (one of
them being mine). All got rejected due to the complexity it introduced,
that's how I ended up with this one-liner.
Performance-wise, I'm understand the problems, but according to ftrace,
ledtrig_disk_activity() adds an average of 0.2us overhead, whether an
LED is assigned or not. Is that really unacceptable?
If so, would introducing a CONFIG_NVME_LED (default =n) and wrap that
call around it make it better? Then at least there's a chance to inform
users that desires this feature about performance costs.
Cheers,
Enzo
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list