[PATCH v3] virtio_blk: add VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME feature support
Bart Van Assche
bvanassche at acm.org
Tue Dec 6 10:43:52 PST 2022
On 12/5/22 08:20, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
> +/* Get lifetime information struct for each request */
> +struct virtio_blk_lifetime {
> + /*
> + * specifies the percentage of reserved blocks that are consumed.
> + * optional values following virtio spec:
> + * 0 - undefined
> + * 1 - normal, < 80% of reserved blocks are consumed
> + * 2 - warning, 80% of reserved blocks are consumed
> + * 3 - urgent, 90% of reserved blocks are consumed
> + */
> + __le16 pre_eol_info;
> + /*
> + * this field refers to wear of SLC cells and is provided in increments of 10used,
> + * and so on, thru to 11 meaning estimated lifetime exceeded. All values above 11
> + * are reserved
> + */
> + __le16 device_lifetime_est_typ_a;
> + /*
> + * this field refers to wear of MLC cells and is provided with the same semantics as
> + * device_lifetime_est_typ_a
> + */
> + __le16 device_lifetime_est_typ_b;
> +};
Why does the above data structure only refer to SLC and MLC but not to
TLC or QLC?
How will this data structure be extended without having to introduce a
new ioctl?
Thanks,
Bart.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list