[PATCH for-next 2/4] io_uring: introduce fixed buffer support for io_uring_cmd
Pavel Begunkov
asml.silence at gmail.com
Mon Aug 22 03:58:24 PDT 2022
On 8/19/22 11:30, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> From: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g at samsung.com>
>
> Add IORING_OP_URING_CMD_FIXED opcode that enables sending io_uring
> command with previously registered buffers. User-space passes the buffer
> index in sqe->buf_index, same as done in read/write variants that uses
> fixed buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k at samsung.com>
> ---
> include/linux/io_uring.h | 5 ++++-
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 +
> io_uring/opdef.c | 10 ++++++++++
> io_uring/rw.c | 3 ++-
> io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring.h b/include/linux/io_uring.h
> index 60aba10468fc..40961d7c3827 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/xarray.h>
>
> +#include<uapi/linux/io_uring.h>
> +
> enum io_uring_cmd_flags {
> IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER = 1,
> IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED = 2,
> @@ -15,6 +17,7 @@ enum io_uring_cmd_flags {
> IO_URING_F_SQE128 = 4,
> IO_URING_F_CQE32 = 8,
> IO_URING_F_IOPOLL = 16,
> + IO_URING_F_FIXEDBUFS = 32,
> };
>
> struct io_uring_cmd {
> @@ -33,7 +36,7 @@ struct io_uring_cmd {
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_IO_URING)
> int io_uring_cmd_import_fixed(u64 ubuf, unsigned long len, int rw,
> - struct iov_iter *iter, void *ioucmd)
> + struct iov_iter *iter, void *ioucmd);
Please try to compile the first patch separately
> void io_uring_cmd_done(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, ssize_t ret, ssize_t res2);
> void io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
> void (*task_work_cb)(struct io_uring_cmd *));
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index 1463cfecb56b..80ea35d1ed5c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ enum io_uring_op {
> IORING_OP_SOCKET,
> IORING_OP_URING_CMD,
> IORING_OP_SENDZC_NOTIF,
> + IORING_OP_URING_CMD_FIXED,
I don't think it should be another opcode, is there any
control flags we can fit it in?
> /* this goes last, obviously */
> IORING_OP_LAST,
> diff --git a/io_uring/opdef.c b/io_uring/opdef.c
> index 9a0df19306fe..7d5731b84c92 100644
> --- a/io_uring/opdef.c
> +++ b/io_uring/opdef.c
> @@ -472,6 +472,16 @@ const struct io_op_def io_op_defs[] = {
> .issue = io_uring_cmd,
> .prep_async = io_uring_cmd_prep_async,
> },
> + [IORING_OP_URING_CMD_FIXED] = {
> + .needs_file = 1,
> + .plug = 1,
> + .name = "URING_CMD_FIXED",
> + .iopoll = 1,
> + .async_size = uring_cmd_pdu_size(1),
> + .prep = io_uring_cmd_prep,
> + .issue = io_uring_cmd,
> + .prep_async = io_uring_cmd_prep_async,
> + },
> [IORING_OP_SENDZC_NOTIF] = {
> .name = "SENDZC_NOTIF",
> .needs_file = 1,
> diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c
> index 1a4fb8a44b9a..3c7b94bffa62 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rw.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rw.c
> @@ -1005,7 +1005,8 @@ int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force_nonspin)
> if (READ_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed))
> break;
>
> - if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_URING_CMD) {
> + if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_URING_CMD ||
> + req->opcode == IORING_OP_URING_CMD_FIXED) {
I don't see the changed chunk upstream
> struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd = (struct io_uring_cmd *)rw;
>
> ret = req->file->f_op->uring_cmd_iopoll(ioucmd);
[...]
--
Pavel Begunkov
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list