New warning in nvme_setup_discard
Oleksandr Natalenko
oleksandr at natalenko.name
Sat Jul 17 05:19:59 PDT 2021
On sobota 17. července 2021 14:11:05 CEST Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> On sobota 17. července 2021 11:35:32 CEST Ming Lei wrote:
> > Maybe you need to check if the build is OK, I can't reproduce it in my
> > VM, and BFQ is still builtin:
> >
> > [root at ktest-01 ~]# uname -a
> > Linux ktest-01 5.14.0-rc1+ #52 SMP Fri Jul 16 18:56:36 CST 2021 x86_64
> > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root at ktest-01 ~]# cat
> > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/scheduler
> > [none] mq-deadline kyber bfq
>
> I don't think this is an issue with the build… BTW, with `initcall_debug`:
>
> ```
> [ 0.902555] calling bfq_init+0x0/0x8b @ 1
> [ 0.903448] initcall bfq_init+0x0/0x8b returned -28 after 507 usecs
> ```
>
> -ENOSPC? Why? Also re-tested with the latest git tip, same result :(.
OK, one extra pr_info, and I see this:
```
[ 0.871180] blkcg_policy_register: BLKCG_MAX_POLS too small
[ 0.871612] blkcg_policy_register: -28
```
What does it mean please :)? The value seems to be hard-coded:
```
include/linux/blkdev.h
60:#define BLKCG_MAX_POLS 5
```
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list